停下來的時候，是為了欣賞人生

★Introduction

• Is there a clear research question, with a solid motivation behind it?
• Is the research question interesting?
• After reading the introduction, did you find yourself motivated to read further?

★Theory

• Does the submission contain a well-developed and articulated theoretical framework?
• Are the core concepts of the submission clearly defined?
• Is the logic behind the hypotheses persuasive?
• Is extant literature appropriately reflected in the submission, or are critical references missing?
• Do the hypotheses or propositions logically flow from the theory?

★Method (for empirical papers)

• Are the sample and variables appropriate for the hypotheses?
• Is the data collection method consistent with the analytical technique(s) applied?
• Does the study have internal and external validity?
• Are the analytical techniques appropriate for the theory and research questions and were they applied appropriately.

★Results (for empirical papers)

• Are the results reported in an understandable way?
• Are there alternative explanations for the results, and if so, are these adequately controlled for in the analyses?

★Contribution

• Does the submission make a value-added contribution to existing research?
• Does the submission stimulate thought or debate?
• Do the authors discuss the implications of the work for the scientific and practice community?

http://meeting.aomonline.org/2009/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=123:revguidelines&catid=39:subguidelines&Itemid=117